So I woke up a few days ago and saw this WSJ piece.
Yes, world; letting real rates stay negative for so long was probably going to do that.
I thought it would be a good excuse to compose another thought piece. Like the kids say: here goes nothing.
Now we've detailed potential drivers for inflation in the past - with oil ripping towards new highs (Saudi-corruption-purge-driven or not), nominal rates ripping higher, and stocks falling, I was curious to also see gold also down.
I am a strong believer that gold trades like a currency rather than a commodity. Commodities for the most part trade based on supply and demand. The demand function is usually the result of end-use products that during special situations may be propelled further by speculative fervor.
Oil gets turned into gasoline and put into vehicles, grains, softs, meats get eaten, metals get thrown together to make cool stuff, etc. etc.
The supply function, in many aspects, behaves in accordance with price. Price goes higher, people invest in getting more of that high price "stuff" whatever it may be and vice versa.
Gold is a bit different. Why? Like all commodities, it can store some value. But the key difference here is the fact that global central banks, those crazy economic professor types, deem it as a viable form of storer of value and medium of exchange so much that they accumulate it as reserves.
My weekly data for gold doesn't go back that far - so here is the chart for the first "regime (1975 to 1985) in monthly spot gold prices.
Yes, world; letting real rates stay negative for so long was probably going to do that.
I thought it would be a good excuse to compose another thought piece. Like the kids say: here goes nothing.
Now we've detailed potential drivers for inflation in the past - with oil ripping towards new highs (Saudi-corruption-purge-driven or not), nominal rates ripping higher, and stocks falling, I was curious to also see gold also down.
I am a strong believer that gold trades like a currency rather than a commodity. Commodities for the most part trade based on supply and demand. The demand function is usually the result of end-use products that during special situations may be propelled further by speculative fervor.
Oil gets turned into gasoline and put into vehicles, grains, softs, meats get eaten, metals get thrown together to make cool stuff, etc. etc.
The supply function, in many aspects, behaves in accordance with price. Price goes higher, people invest in getting more of that high price "stuff" whatever it may be and vice versa.
Gold is a bit different. Why? Like all commodities, it can store some value. But the key difference here is the fact that global central banks, those crazy economic professor types, deem it as a viable form of storer of value and medium of exchange so much that they accumulate it as reserves.
As a result, gold more than any other precious metal trades like a currency based on the rates of the country that it's denominated in.
So here we are at the focal investigation of the post. Hypothetically, if inflation rises (let's not argue this right now and just assume such is the case), will gold be a good hedge?
Let's go to the charts first, since I'm lazy.
Yes, yes I know - I didn't get the chance to run the regression on returns vs returns - I have a very finite window to use BBG and the files I build I cannot keep. On top of that, without a BBG API, it takes a horrific amount of time to manually extrapolate the real yield (before the existence of TIPS) by interpolating the CPI.
With my whining aside, even with an "incorrect" price vs price regression - you can observe the directional relationship between gold and those rates. Also, the relative relationship between the different rate products vs gold should be valid as well (the base effect from the regression of price vs price as a result of the level differences should be somewhat negated as all the rate products are roughly on the same base level).
Spot gold px vs real yield shows the tightest connection here. So we'll focus in on that one for a sec.
From the above, it is evident that gold goes down when real yields go up in a semi-lockstep fashion. (I assume the economic driver here is: holding gold which yields nothing vs holding a currency which in some situations can yield a lot in real terms and in other situations can yield very little or even negative in real terms)
Conclusion 1 - Gold trades rather closely with real yields. Although there are sure to be other factors influencing the gold price, it is roughly over the long term a function of real yields.
Moving along. Assuming the answered found in Conclusion 1. Can gold always be a good hedge for inflation? Or better yet, can real vs nominal yields diverge (widening of breakevens and thus the emergence of "inflation") without real yields actually going up significantly (real yields going up would theoretically put significant downward pressure on gold)
Let's look at some different yield regimes.
The two main interests that occupy my focus for this experiment. They are the high inflation periods of the 70's and 80's as well as the periods of shock post the dot-com bubble and the GFC.
Now I'm going to add some events to shed some qualitative light on the various worldly happens which caused individual reactions to rates.
FYI, for those with a short attention span - this will be a very long table. I will highlight in red those times when real rates were likely zero or negative (higher inflation vs fed funds rate) and I will also provide a summary at the bottom.
Disclaimers:
The inflation prints were averaged out for entire years while the Fed Funds rate is printed on the table only when a change occurs. Basically, this analysis is far from perfect.
However, assuming that those highlighted periods were times when real rates were either negative or close to zero is probably semi-safe. Besides, what's life without the right amount of danger, eh?
Those with the curiosity of a cat and armed with a Bloomberg terminal can hopefully use this as a launch pad for additional analysis.
Whoa, that was a lot of blog space. If you want a descriptive version of what happened - here's an NY Times article.
So to summarize some of the events in the table, we have a few periods of interest. You have 1973 - 1979 where there were often times when real rates were either negative or close to being negative. Same can be said about 2004 - 2005 and then 2008 where real rates were negative at the end of the year. - 2016.
I believe monetary stimulus is much more effective (perhaps, only effective) when there is fiscal stimulus implemented in a concurrent fashion.
Here is a chart of long-term government spending.
If you carefully look, I saw spikes in government spending relative to government receipts in 1975-1977, what looks to be around 1987, 1992, 2001, and then 2009. Therefore, I expect those times, if combined with low/negative rates to create a sizable amount of inflation.
The opposite trend could be said from the mid-1990's to 2000. I would expect low inflation during this period especially if real rates were positive.
Now tying it all together with the gold price. I have three screenshots.
Rates: Nominal vs Real in different "regimes"
Spot gold prices in corresponding "regimes"
My weekly data for gold doesn't go back that far - so here is the chart for the first "regime (1975 to 1985) in monthly spot gold prices.
1975 - 1985
As you can see from the above: our data starts with gold falling close to ~50% (from 180 to below 100) from 1975 to late 1976 as real yields rose against steady nominals (a closing of the breakeven inflation).
Then, we experienced something extraordinarily scary - a rise in nominal yields with a falling real yield from 1978 to 1980. This development of inflation along with real yields actually trading lower led to an explosion in gold prices (trough to peak move of ~400% in one year) - proving that gold was indeed a good inflation hedge in this scenario. Finally, real yields marched higher along with nominals and gold went into a huge bear market.
So yes, there can be a bond bear market (nominal rates rising) while there is a breakout in inflation - during which gold would be a great hedge. However, interestingly, even with low rates and inflation during the early and mid-1970's, gold actually fell ~50%. Remember, 1975 we had the increase in government spending as noted above. In addition, we had close to negative real rates.
It seems that the direction of the real yield and the general direction of inflation actually caused gold prices to fall despite the absolute level of inflation was still high.
Bretton Woods and the oil shock were monumental events that contributed to all asset classes in this period. I'm not an expert on either of those subjects, so I will leave any potential contributions & impact of those events to this price action to you guys.
1985 - 1996
Moving on to the next time bucket. 1985-1996 saw a rally in gold from 1985 to 1988 coming out of the bear market. 1986 - 1987 saw a small pocket of breakeven inflation going higher, potentially triggering gold higher as well.
Interestingly as nominal rates continue to fall in the beginning of the 1990's - real rates roughly stay the same. Gold did not trade closely with real rates in this scenario and instead tracked breakeven inflation as both kept getting squeezed lower.
Lastly, you had meaningful moves in nominals and real yield first higher, then lower in 1994 to 1996. Gold ultimately did not care as it stayed tightly range bound.
1996 - 2009
A quick side note: of the 4 rates charts in the real vs nominal screenshot above, this regime's chart actually has the red line as the real yield and blue as the nominal - sorry for any confusion.
Continuing with the decrease in government spending and generally low inflation of the mid-1990's - gold continues to slide, goes nowhere.
Then, when we hit the 2000's, we started to see both nominals and real yield go lower. This move was roughly in tandem so I don't think breakevens were moving much. With a slight expansion of breakevens and inflation itself not really trading directionally despite lower rates and increased government spending, gold's reaction was to steadily build into a bull market.
In my opinion, this move in gold in the 2000's could be explained by persistently lower real yield. Inflation had risen slightly but it was nothing significant and definitely dwarfed by the move in gold.
Lastly, we have 2008 - 2009. Real yields spiked higher while inflation collapsed - gold subsequently sold off, tracking both inflation and real yields pretty well.
2009 - Present
Post GFC, the most interesting period of time was late 2011 to 2013. Nominals started to bottom out while real yield continued to march lower. We began building higher lows in breakevens as inflation looked poised to go higher.
This actually proved to be the peak in gold. As real yields spiked higher in what was later deemed the taper tantrum with gold going into bear market ever since.
Conclusion 2: After all that rambling, here's to summarize: I think gold is probably less of an inflation hedge than some might think. Although it does follow inflation to an extent - gold also seems to be very sensitive to real yield moves. If you believe real yields are set to rise along with inflation - then gold might not necessarily do very well - for example, 1981-1982, gold kind of topped out despite the fact that there was still pretty high inflation simply because real yields were rising.
But then, you have scenarios such as the early/mid-2000's with low and steady inflation, with a consistently lower real yield, where we also witnessed the foundation of a huge gold bull market.
And ultimately, there are scenarios of higher nominal yield and lower real yield - usually, they are ephemeral, lasting only a few months. However, we saw a meaningful one that lasted from 1978 to 1980.
Keep in mind as with many things in the market, it seems that direction mattered more often than level. For example, when the widening of real and nominal rates in 1980 hit its zenith, gold was already peaking.
Other miscellaneous charts for your musings:
Here's FED and ECB assets vs spot gold price
Here's gold vs the VIX
I think our own Macro Man did a little bit of analysis on that one as well. I'm sure all the readers have seen that one, but in case you haven't, here it is - linked here.
And that's all I got this go-round, guys.
Hope everyone has a wonderful day and weekend. Stay warm out there!
63 comments
Click here for commentsI am convinced inflation is unknowable. Someone give me the definition. The mechanism that sets it in motion. The environment that fosters inflation. What is price? What is value? Let’s define the natural or real rate. I can make a very good case that all market rates are is the individuals inter-temporal time preference.
ReplyMy point is I’d love to sit back and ask the question-why inflation, as we know it, even exists. Now I am obviously aware of scarcity and the nuts and bolts of S/D and the concept of finite resources causing possible price hikes in that individual commodity. However why do all prices suddenly increase together? Is that the herding mechanisms that just cause a panic in humans? What is inflation and how can we separate it from real economic growth. I have a unique take on it and why the CB’s love it besides it’s benefits to accrued debt. Which even that Econ 101 maxim is unproven. It’s to long of an explanation for this thread but...yeah I’ve got thoughts.
Answering the question above I’d say NO gold isn’t a guaranteed hedge at all anymore. In fact it’s been positively correlated to the dollar the past year...at least more positive l correlation between the dollar and gold than we’ve seen in the past. I think yields and inflation goes up together along with the dollar. 78-80 was a great period to highlight falling real yields and rising nominal yields. FOR ME this is more of a volatility breakout. Like a serious haywire event in the market. This move is where Gold fucking shines. You might say it’s still a safe have currency or for sure end of the world insurance...
Hey , Leftback. No shit, I haven't read of this report. It's a Saturday report! No shit.....ya think you and I have started something in Hollywood. You know it doesn't matter.....each way it goes,..... I'm taking home those Eastern European breed fillies, or nothing at all.
Reply@Leftback, I'm going into analysis mode from here. Going into a journey within the markets for 3 months on my uni break until I start last semester. But, I'll leave you with this between breaks. At least Goldfinger used to throw his shit around on the polo field and back it up.
ReplyGreat post, Detroit Red! I just want to put my 2 cents in. Technically speaking, gold price is in a 125-pt wide uptrend channel and is about to kiss the bottom of the channel at 1260-ish. If my near-term dollar bearishness is confirmed, we are about to see an uplift back to 1385-ish. Should this channel break down significantly I will lay down the arms and go home. No need to fight.
ReplyGold is still overvalued relative to usd/jpy. Until this is equalised we cannot see the next leg. For pocket money, a short on both on a intra-day basis is still paying out.
ReplyState Street’s $11.8 billion junk-bond ETF had one of the biggest withdrawals in its history on Friday.
Replyhttps://twitter.com/lisaabramowicz1/status/930055334315659265
Nice post, DR. Thank you! This site needed that post.
ReplyDon't think I left any comments last week. Wild one in merger arbitrage land where you had AT&T insinuating through press leaks that the antitrust head at the DoJ is Trump's stooge. Very unusual.
Anyhow ... tightened up the macro book, exiting aluminum (waning mo), CAC v SPX ex-FANG (also, waning mo), pairing EURNOK (but put back on later today). Made decent money scalping USDCAD from the short side, ditto NZDUSD from long side, though latter doesn't feel ready for much of a bounce. EURRON is interesting and I initiated a new long there. Central bank allowing more FX flexibility, and fiscal situation and real rates going the wrong way. Not expecting to get rich, after bid/ask and the forward points, but seems OK. Have bought some OTM upside in sterling, thinking that the exit bill impasse gets resolved, markets presume a transitional deal, and a hiking cycle can unfold. Still quite uncertain when the bill is settled. Would seem to be December (David Davis confirmed that thinking just recently, but some on European side talking March). If anyone has a view on the timing, speak up. Have to think Tories won't do anything to precipitate an early election, so not so worried about these challenges to May within the party (there was some comment by a Minister in The Times, but giving it short shrift). Still, only involved in options. My biggest exposure - also all through options - remains long EURCHF. Hedged out my delta on RKO oil calls expiring shortly.
China data has been coming in weaker lately. Take note. The $64B question: will China abandon annual GDP targets? Xi didn't mention a GDP target in his whole 3 hour speech. Hard for me to be too bullish (China-dependent) EM going into 2018.
My bucket of cold water today is for yield curve doom and gloom. JPM: equities never peaked before the yield curve became outright inverted. In the time it takes 2s10s to go from 72 to 0 AMZN can hit Morgan Stanley's new $2,000 target! Have to do better, bears.
Wild card is a Saudi-Iranian war. MBS really wants to open another front in Lebanon when he can't make headway in Yemen? Would be nuts, right?
Saudi not get much support to do anything in Lebanon. No-starter.
ReplyLebanon is not having it that’s for sure. I know of a lebonese journalist over there and she made it clear that they are not only not willing to support the SA regime, but outwardly hostile to it. She’s a little biased, but the information I gleaned on my own generally supports her view
ReplyThe flattener is back. 2s10s at 70 again. We are close to 100% on a Dec rate hike priced into FFR, so upward pressure on the entire curve is likely to abate a little here. We added a little to our long bond position yesterday. Dollar is weaker. Keep an eye on the yen, also some signs of Japanese inflation getting off the floor, remarkable if true, and with consequences for equities obviously, since the Nikkei for sure is nothing but a massive leveraged yen carry trade…
ReplyBonds sold off - for about a minute - after the hotter than expected PPI today. Wages and consumer spending are the data points that the long end is paying attention to, and inflation expectations by those measures remain soft. We would expect to see the short end stay more or less pinned into FOMC and long end rates drift lower as the flattener grinds on.
Looking ahead we have Nov options expiration this Friday and then the short week into Thanksgiving. It would not be surprising to see Vol Sellers ride in once more to rescue US equities and junk bonds, but the resulting relief rally might be the last hurrah for a while.
DXY broke down below the uptrend channel. Projected distance is roughly 1.70
ReplyThis means a s/t target of roughly 92.70 which also happens to be horizontal supp/res.
Consecutive daily closes below 94 would pretty much open the floodgates.
@IPA - I'm a buyer here. Model says it's a good entry so have to take it. If your analysis is correct, at least it will be quick and painless:)
ReplyThe Nikkei trade was nothing but a dream for them. Dream away in Paris why don't ya. Never been gladder to be on the receiving end of a distance call. "Fuck I love the punt"
ReplyThere got no idea how to trade the Nikkei, none.
ReplyAlright, I'm going for my break. And I promise I won't send in any bowlers in the comments section on my behalf, I'll leave you alone.
Reply"Hello""...."Yeah, where are ya"...."oh,..that's good!"
Reply@amp do you actually live on a beach in Thailand? Very impressed you're still up at this hour
ReplyEl_Erian for Fed VC? I've not read a single editorial of his that I didn't have to re-read only to conclude that he has nothing to say. Needless to say, it's been years since I've wasted my time on his musings.
ReplyI nominate TMM for Fed VC. They've actually got something to say, damnit!
I think that $54.10 - 54.30 should serve as a launch pad on WTI. I understand the worries some may have over API and lower demand news out of IEA. One should not forget about the power struggle in the oil hot spots. There is a real fear of a war out there. Who knows how these things get started?
Replyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1oi8jnMYzA
A lot of goldbugs have switched to buying crypto as their new safe haven fad.
ReplyAlso consider what happens in other countries wiht huge inflation - if they buy gold for theior own ghedging it pushes up global prices even in non inflationary countries.
Also look at USD action in inflationary times. It rarely follows the inflation up usd down rules .so looking at XAU/USD is clouded by USD not doing what is expected.
Also may be worth looking at inflation expectations rather than actual inflation as everything prices off expecations rather than reality.
I personally liek gold but would not consider the inflation angle as a reason to trade it.
If I want to hedge inflation in my life I d rather buy futures is things I consume to live.
Thanks for the posts guys ~Top stuff
Pol
Thanks.
ReplyI agree. Using breakevens here when I talk about “inflation” but to be more precise, I should’ve said “inflation expectations”, since breakevens are a market measure and thus has the expectation portion built into it.
Also, I think many gold bugs bought gold in 2011-2013 more in a speculative nature and used “inflation expectation” as the excuse if you will. I think that’s the major of those individuals who are trading cryptos under the same reasoning. I’m not sure if you can truly deem their goal as inflation hedging even if they explicit say so. Although I don’t have much evidence to back this claim, my gut feeling is that it’s not an unreasonable assumption.
BOND SHORTS BEING EDWARD THE SECONDED. What a lovely way to start the morning.
ReplyCPI not really all that hot, more of the same, maybe the whisper number was higher. Short covering and a bit of risk off trade has seen yields sink again. Watch TLT spike, looks like it will fill a couple of gaps in the chart this morning.
The yen was already strong but USDJPY is taking a tumble on that CPI print. Who knew? (We really nailed this one last week).
2s10s 64bps, 5s30s 76 bps. At this rate we will invert by New Year.
Eye-catching moves in NOK and SEK. Caught off-side in the former, but was lightly positioned. Not-so-lightly positioned, now;) I guess the narratives are "no catalysts" and now seeing "housing busts coming?" My guess is position-clearing, time-of-year, and maybe some programmatic buying? Low prices are a cure for themselves, in some sense. Lower SEK increases odds Riksbank actually starts withdrawing some accommodation. Guessing some re-evaluating their call for end QE at the December meeting after the CPI print, but a forward-looking bank is going to see FX pass-through effects of this move, so I wouldn't write-off that "catalyst" for later this year. In Norway, the pass-through effects matter less, IMO, because even with them, the central bank isn't going to move for some time given the inflation undershoot currently (which, they're at least very patient/pragmatic about). Maybe you get the rate path revised a bit in December. More a value call, where it's hard to trust your valuation because the current market price says prices are so out-of-whack that your model no longer works.
ReplyROBO is going to be hilarious sometime in H1 2018 when holders realize they're long a bunch of "highly cyclical industrial machine tool" companies and not "robot jobs apocalypse" companies. Not shorting now, though.
ReplyChina is slowing. The driver of the world's real economy is slowing.
TSLA is going to be sold to Geely for $1 billion in 2022.
November. The best time of the year. When no one on November or December year-end wants to warehouse risk.
Got to love people buying nickel "because of EVs, you know." Sure, I'm sure spot will price your expected balance in the year 2023 today.
Today's bounce was quite predictable given: (a) Nov options expiration tomorrow, and (b) Turkey week approaching, not to mention (c) Denis Gartman going short [it is almost a given that markets will bounce on this news].
ReplyIt is noteworthy that we are seeing risky assets bid and vol sold, but that there is no movement in USDJPY. This is especially unusual for the case of Japanese equities, which are bid in the absence of its usual FX complement. Keep an eye on that.
The yield curve has not steepened today, some selling across the curve, all of which is consistent with the USD not doing much. We are therefore inclined to treat the "rally" in equities as a predictable short squeeze associated with the usual options-related adjustments, and we expect the vol selling to persist into next week's characteristically thin and generally meaningless trading. A good time to take a snooze, with an eye to reloading a few positions, beginning the day after Thanksgiving. Home gamers will be buying up their favorite tech stocks, FANGs, shale plays, electric car Ponzis and other silly shit... but LB will be busy studying the charts - especially looking for signs of breakdown in the small caps, dollar/yen, and high yield.
We remain long TLT, technicals look good, and we plan to stay there and ride the flattener for a while until there is a significant risk-off event or something changes to alter our view of medium-term inflation expectations.
This wasn't the BIG ONE, obviously (nobody here thought that it was), and we may not have seen the top. In addition, the next sell-off we see will not be the BIG ONE. But given the ingredients (margin debt, vol selling, algos, ETFs, passive investing) we are more convinced than ever that it is out there....
@LB, folks like Gartman is why I don't ever turn my TV on any more. Total disgrace.
ReplyI am enjoying WMT rally. When I had turned bullish the stock in summer some here probably chuckled. I got hurt on the other side when AMZN made new high. But they can co-exist. Watch XRT take off into Xmas. The inverted h+s is going to hurt a lot of shorts. Some resistance to overcome at $42 and $44 but my ultimate target is $46.
Took down EURNOK position this morning after going bazooka the previous early morning in the 9.75-9.78 range. Rarely go nuts in delta-one like that.
ReplyThe bad news is I was too distracted by the flood of adrenaline to put on a dual digital in USDKRW, USDTWD. Awesome correlation setup to cheapen short USDKRW, but now TWDKRW having moved almost 2% in two days, the "trade location" isn't there anymore. Damn, damn, damn. Damn.
Going into 2018, the default position seems to be long FANG (US structural growth) plus long non-US equities (early cycle vs US's late cycle). I suspect a growth disappointment though. This year, it was China, US shale spending, and rebounds in places like Brazil and Russia from recessions, but what takes the growth baton in 2018? I don't see it in the US (why would companies invest when end-demand is consumers with low savings rates, meager real wage growth, and poor demographics?). Maybe a better case to be made for European capex, but still .... All the data is pointing to slower growth in China, and that's hard to offset.
FDAX has got a little TLC over the previous two sessions. It is up around 15% year to date. The recent sell off from highs can be attributed to any number of reasons (cough, excuses), Siemens, Allianz, higher Euro, slowing China data(huge export market) ECB and on a smaller excuse - profit taking.
ReplyFrom a technical aspect a reversal pattern is taking place on the daily chart(if you are into that kinda of thing) while more advanced technical objectives were played out.
So johno, and Shawn (re:French equities a while back) I would tend to agree that is more upside here than US.
*Disclaimer, while not in the same league as Gartman i have be known to have my moments.
Enjoy the weekend lads.
Skr, no need to put in a stock market disclaimer. We process everything here as if your were our PM going into bat for the English elite. You won't ever get a penny's day of work out of me.
ReplyFind another mug.
ReplyWall Street , and the City of London. Leave a poor mug alone. Give your trading seat to some else. I don't won't party to any of it. Its not me. Accept it. I don't want that life.
ReplyKeep your royal hand. Save it for someone else. This guy has folded , and is very happy to lose this hand. My game will peak in Asia. Hard.
ReplyNot a Scobby doo what that means.
ReplyCan you please give me either, Benjamin Franklin's glasses from Nlational Treasure or two of whatever your taking!
Until then amps...
https://youtu.be/UI3F687SsoU
@Skr, this market goes on and on and on. With one hand trying to handle the other. The turd on Wall Street has won at his game of frustration. But, he has lost at his attempt to make sure the wicket that I am supposed to bat on is an ant shit nest by the time I get to the crease. I came here to this blog to prepare to bet. The British elite and there cousins in America are just like the same as their lineage of horse trainers, they expect you to shovel the shit each morning , and when race day comes your not allowed to think and express yourself to anyone to make a quid yourself. There bullshit. That's why I went to Japan, to see how they operated over there.
Reply@Skr, nice song, but not interested.
ReplyNotice that the real rate associated equities have broken down recently moving from broadly range bound for so long to what I suggest is now a down trend. Plenty of room I think for these to establish a lower range in line with where the market thinks we will be on real rates in the UK.
ReplySo maybe there is a big stop hunt in the works for Gold above 1,300 next week? Weak dollar, uptrend channel support, thin holiday trading, whatever... It just wants to go back up. My ultimate target is 1,500 with 1,385 as a near-term objective.
ReplyJohno. Couldn't agree more on robo. Was thinking the same thing though I am nursing some very offside positions playing the China slowdown so waiting for more confirmation still. Yes nickel is ridiculous too, though to be fair it's not far off its 2016 low so maybe the though is you don't have much to lose.
ReplyChinese data is slowing but you had some holidays and party stuff in sept oct so I don't want to get too bearish. But when new loan growth for q1 disappoints, which it likely will, then markets wake up. Let's see.
Action in some single name stocks still looks dubious to me. Wmt going bananas, yet trading at 21x. Really. Earning are still lower than in 2014.value guys bought it. Have to think they are sellers here. But computer quants love it bc it has moments and quality. Seeing the same sort of value underperformance and momo out performance jump in. And with hy spreads widening its not a good sign. For sure this is just act 1 but let's see what hy, eu and jp do to close out the year. The junk always sells off first, not the good merchandise like fang. Also watch some fang hy issues from tsla and nflx.
So tencent is one of the largest companies on earth, trades at 30x ebit and makes most of to money from video games. Great company but when u are a mega cap that multiple needs to come down. Look at aapl. But as long as growth is there ppl continue to pay up. The other leg of tech, semis are seeing real increases in prices and demand. Good job. But let's not remember this is still a cyclical business.
Unless capex is going to really improve due to tax reform and eu confidence, which can replace lost Chinese investment, estimates for growth are too high. When that translates into corporate earnings, I'm not quite sure but I think pretty soon.
@abee, I think WMT is at ATH due to the fact that their online growth is accelerating and they are finally "getting it". Also, ppl have been worried about AMZN/WFM price cuts slicing into grocery side of WMT. Well, that side did really well in the last qtr. So it is sort of a relief rally and an absolute annihilation of WMT shorts who added to positions on AMZN/WFM deal. I think it has a bit more room to run on that (prob until Xmas) before taking a breather. Speaking of grocery, watch KR do some serious damage to shorts here as well. Another favorite of mine on short squeeze idea.
Replynear term you may be right IPA. But I am pretty confident that fast money wasnt buying walmart 2 years ago, value guys were. And at todays prices they are probably sellers (or at least I would be). If fast money wants to play WMT go ahead. But its not a growth name. Anyways the point is just to showcase a potential blow off top in some stocks. Look what the DAX and TOPIX did with them... just thinking
Replyhttp://ritholtz.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/blogcoments.png
Reply:-)
Oh man, these Scandi currencies are a fun ride!
ReplyUtterly predictable run-up to the Holiday as performance chasers follow their personal indexes and benchmarks. Never ever short the market during the low volume pre-Thanksgiving week. Ever.
ReplySmall caps leading and RUT making a new high on yet another short squeeze; vol selling back in vogue.
Look for VIX to make another trip below 9, but also watch the continued strength in JPY and Treasuries, as the curve flattens again - now 2s10s below 60bps, 5s30s below 70 bps, 10s30s at 40 bps.
To LB's point: "The Stock Trader's Almanac shows the Wednesday before and Friday after Thanksgiving have had a positive combined performance in 34 of the last 35 years (1964 was the only exception)."
Reply@Johno I believe those stats are up to 1987. From there on it has had other negative years, the hit rate is still pretty good though. I think it's ~75%.
ReplyV quiet on here. Did you all go bust shorting SPX over the past 6 months?
Reply@BS, we can't chew and talk at the same time.
ReplyYellen telegraphed FOMC minutes yesterday. Good job, Janet! Too little, too late. That's how you are going to be remembered. Confused Fed chairman who raised rates into "non-transitory" low inflation.
USD will be murdered. Sell DXY, buy Gold. More of the same from me, sorry...
Happy Thanksgiving!
Talking about historical data what's the latest on the October-May skew? Usually by this time of the year we have made a viable base for upward skew. NOt really apparent this year here in the UK.
Reply@Buystocks, still confused I see. Well, persevere and who knows you may still get out of your parents basement before you are grey at the temples. I was going there for patronising with a hint of insincere kindness in line with the fact that you have proven to be an arse unworthy of anything better.
Hey, Lefty. Make sure you write her a out a check before she leaves the desk.
Replyhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pdd1k3Fn8mc
On this Thanksgiving Day, I am giving thanks to MM and all the posters and commenters. Appreciate all the effort and insights!
ReplyYes Gus, a good bunch on here. Thanks guys for the wit and commitment. Respect.
Replyhttps://youtu.be/0dcbw4IEY5w
Well, I'm usually sh1t at looking much into the future, but here's my pick for 2018: 1Y 25D calls on EURCHF. You pretty much have to own something like that, because if EURCHF really takes off and you don't make money on that, well, you f-cking suck. That's what I'm telling myself at least.
Reply"Well, I'm usually sh1t at looking much into the future" - you're in good company on this blog then johno. Thankful for the ineptitude of all you guys, so that I can fade your calls and bank coin.
ReplyOur gatekeepers must be sound asleep. If the obnoxious shaking of a piggy bank with a single coin in it doesn't wake them up, then I don't know what will. Ugh... I hate noise!
ReplySpeaking of children, their misbehavior, and shiny coins... I don't agree with a notion of cryptocurrencies replacing gold as a safe haven. Who is the majority holder of cryptocurrencies? Not only is he completely opposite (and opposed) to govts and institutions, but also much younger, less mature, has zero attention span, lacks real balls to hold into drawdowns (and those are quite deep), thus resulting in these enormous gyrations indicative of a craze and complete instability of the vehicle, which is therefore not suitable for the safe haven term at all. Besides the point, is there enough to go around? One has to imagine it's all a supply and demand imbalance at the moment, illiquid market driven by kids and techies with zero regard to fundamentals and in a simple pursuit of a price. Please excuse my puns, but while children generally bring joy they also possess this amazing ability to arouse the anger in adults that results in sever repercussions. How long will the govts and institutions tolerate the rise of unruly children until their inevitable grounding occurs? I say 2018 brings the war on this new millennial craze and restores the order. I am buying more coins, gold coins, that is. ;)
I can tell you have put a lot of work into it. Good work!
Replyคาสิโนออนไลน์ UFABET
ของดี
Replyหวย
ทีเด้ด
แมนแล้ว
สุดยอด
google
gold
สล็อต
Replyสล็อต
สล็อต
สล็อตออนไลน์
สล็อตออนไลน์
สล็อตออนไลน์
Thanks for sharing. บ้านผลบอล
Replyบ้านผลบอล
บ้านผลบอล
บ้านผลบอล
Cool post. บ้านผลบอล
Replyบ้านผลบอล
บ้านผลบอล
You fucking nerd
ReplyIf at that time, when I was a student, I was shown this site, I would have completely forgotten about writing everything. edubirdie reviews is really a miracle. Instead of sitting for hours over that piece of paper or paying your classmates, it's much more rational to just order a paper here. You just go to the site and have no problem getting your result, which you are not ashamed to show to the professor. Most importantly, each work stands out for its uniqueness and no one can prideretsya. I think the price is fully justified, because I do not know anyone who can write a similar work for such a time and money.
ReplyLearn a new way to gamble.
Replytwiceufapro.com